星空传媒

features

Righting Society's Wrongs

Alumna Bhavani Raveendran鈥檚 passion for justice fuels her civil rights practice—and helped George Floyd鈥檚 family secure a historic settlement

Photo: Bob Stefko
Bhavani Raveendran

The video images that sparked protests around the world, showing the death of George Floyd under the knee of a Minneapolis police officer, are excruciating to watch. The distraught Black man pleading for air; the seemingly indifferent white officer keeping Floyd pinned to the ground for more than nine minutes

The injustice seemed so obvious.

But the law was not as clear.

A web of statutes and case law protecting police from liability made the Floyd family鈥檚 lawsuit a challenge.

That鈥檚 why Bhavani Raveendran, JD (CWR 鈥�09)—a key member of the family鈥檚 legal team—spent more than 50 hours scrutinizing cellphone videos, as well as police body camera and surveillance footage, of the May 2020 killing.

The details were critical to building a case that officers used unreasonable force and were 鈥渙n notice鈥� that their actions violated Floyd鈥檚 civil and constitutional rights.

Raveendran watched over and over, and from different angles, as officer Derek Chauvin kept his knee planted on Floyd鈥檚 back and neck while Floyd and bystanders fruitlessly begged for his life.

鈥淲hat do [the four officers on the scene] appear to be aware of?鈥� Raveendran wanted to know. 鈥淲hat was George saying? What were they saying in response?鈥� And the list went on.

The experience was grueling. But she persevered to achieve a measure of justice for a murdered man, a grieving family, and citizens across the nation demanding accountability and convulsed in a reckoning over structural racism and police violence.

鈥淲e tried to cover every research issue and every potential problem or legal precedent,鈥� said Raveendran, who leads the civil rights practice at the Chicago law firm of Romanucci & Blandin LLC. 鈥淲e were prepared in a way that made it clear that we were not going away.鈥�

Led by renowned civil rights lawyer Ben Crump, JD, the legal team secured a $27 million settlement last year. Crump called it the nation鈥檚 largest pretrial, civil rights wrongful-death settlement involving police. And he later praised Raveendran鈥檚 legal insights and tireless dedication, describing her as 鈥渁 trusted partner on some of the highest-profile civil rights cases in recent history.鈥�

Just a decade out of law school, Raveendran has become a go-to advocate when abuses of power result in deaths or injuries that shock the community conscience. She and her firm have represented many families affected by police violence; gymnasts in the sexual assault cases against former U.S. national team physician Larry Nassar; students in a school hazing case that produced a $1 million settlement; and the family of a woman killed during a high-speed police chase that resulted in a $21.3 million verdict.

Colleagues say she has an uncommon ability to gain traumatized clients鈥� trust and an inexhaustible determination to do right by them. Inspired by her two grandfathers—lawyers in India who aided everyday people—Raveendran sees litigation as a force for positive change.

Today she and her law-firm colleagues have a 鈥渇ight till we can鈥檛 fight anymore鈥� attitude that she said led to Crump鈥檚 interest in partnering on cases.

鈥淗e knew that he could come to us because that鈥檚 just kind of what we do for every case, big or small,鈥� she said. 鈥淭hat鈥檚 just how we are.鈥�

A Family Commitment to Justice

Raveendran鈥檚 lifelong commitment to helping people who endured injustices began with her family.

Her paternal grandfather, a family-law attorney who died before she was born, 鈥渨ould load up all his [law] books into a bull-ox cart鈥� as he traveled rural India to see clients, her father told her. 鈥淗e was a source of compassion and protection for a lot of people,鈥� she said.

On summer visits to India, Raveendran became close to her maternal grandfather, who died last year at 99. He was active in the student movement for Indian independence and later represented unions and served on boards of education. He used law 鈥渁s a tool to make society better,鈥� she said, and had 鈥渁 huge impact on me.鈥�

Raveendran was raised in the Chicago suburbs and regularly visited Cleveland to spend holidays with relatives, including cousins who attended 星空传媒 and introduced her to the university.

Intent on a legal career, Raveendran majored in political science at 星空传媒 and graduated in three years. Political science professor Kelly McMann, PhD, tapped Raveendran as a research assistant, in part because of her enthusiasm during class discussions. 鈥淗er regular questions and comments really energized her peers,鈥� McMann said.

Raveendran鈥檚 exuberance also drew the interest of fellow student Manu Srivastava (CWR 鈥�09). They married in 2017.

From Intern to Leader

Raveendran developed her interests in civil rights and human rights law through practical experiences at American University鈥檚 law school and several nonprofits. She successfully argued for asylum on behalf of a refugee from the Democratic Republic of Congo through her school鈥檚 International Human Rights Clinic and 鈥渞eally enjoyed representing a person and fighting on their behalf instead of for an abstract idea,鈥� she said.

Raveendran also wrote a guide to help asylum seekers for the Torture Abolition and Survivors Support Coalition and battled anti-Muslim discrimination while at the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

In 2013, she returned to Chicago, eager to work in a practice focused on civil rights.

Antonio Romanucci, JD, the founding partner of Romanucci & Blandin, said he realized a few minutes into Raveendran鈥檚 2015 job interview that he wanted to hire her because of 鈥渉er passion for wanting to help people.

鈥淪he develops very close relationships with clients because of her personality,鈥� he said. 鈥淭hat鈥檚 what makes her a favorite of colleagues, too. She鈥檚 willing to throw herself into the mix.鈥�

He said those qualities explain why she was tapped at a young age for several leadership positions in the American Association for Justice, a national organization representing plaintiff-side lawyers. And last year she became a partner in the firm. 鈥淣ot only does she gain trust,鈥� Romanucci said, 鈥渂ut she is trustworthy.鈥�

At the same time, colleagues say, Raveendran has been a pioneering presence in plaintiff-side civil litigation.

Photo: Bob Stefko
Raveendran in downtown Chicago.

鈥淏havani is navigating a space that is not easy to occupy as a woman, let alone as a woman of color, and she is not afraid to speak up and take charge,鈥� said Michelle Simpson Tuegel, JD, a Dallas-based litigator who represented more than 20 survivors of Nassar鈥檚 abuse in cases that were part of a $380 million settlement with USA Gymnastics, U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee and their insurers. She and Raveendran worked together on Nassar cases and others.

鈥淏havani has that ability to advocate, see the issues in the case and communicate with the client in a way that is effective and kind,鈥� Tuegel said. 鈥淪he is one of those rare lawyers I work with whose work product and way of communicating with clients I trust as much as my own.鈥�

Fighting for Justice in Cases Large and Small

In 2016, Raveendran and her colleagues secured a settlement of $200,000 each for five former Illinois high school student-athletes who claimed they were physically and sexually assaulted as part of a hazing ritual.

Raveendran—who supervised the day-to-day legal work—brought her trademark diligence to the case, reading about 20,000 pages of documents while helping to develop a new way to hold school districts liable under Illinois law. Raveendran said they argued that even if coaches or other personnel didn鈥檛 directly participate in hazing, they could be considered culpable if they knew about it and did nothing to stop it and protect students.

Three years later, Raveendran worked on trial preparation and helped cross-examine witnesses as part of the team that won the $21.3 million verdict against the city of Chicago and two police officers after a high-speed pursuit of another vehicle killed a 37-year-old mother and injured five relatives in her van.

The crash 鈥渉ad a horrific impact on this family,鈥� Raveendran said. 鈥淣o number would make that go away, but at least they had some justice.鈥�

The case that initially inspired Crump鈥檚 trust in Raveendran and her colleagues was smaller and less damaging. It involved a Black man allegedly harassed and arrested for no reason, the kind of case that other lawyers might decline. But her firm took it on.

鈥淚 remember talking to Ben about that, and talking to the practical issues in the case,鈥� said Raveendran, 鈥渁nd then saying: 鈥楤ut you know what? The hell with it. We鈥檙e going to fight until we can鈥檛 fight anymore.鈥� 鈥�

Only a day after George Floyd was killed in Minneapolis, Raveendran and her law firm colleagues joined Crump on the case. Floyd鈥檚 death hadn鈥檛 yet reverberated around the world. But what drew Raveendran and her firm was the egregious injustice and the possibility of using the law to press for changes in policing and secure some accountability for a family grieving its own loss and determined to stop police killings of Black people.

Photo: Ethan Miller/Getty Images News via Getty Image

Ben Crump speaks alongside (L-R) fellow attorneys Bhavani Raveendran, Ian Fallon and Antonio Romanucci; George Floyd鈥檚 nephew Brandon Williams; Floyd鈥檚 brother Philonise Floyd; and Byron Williams鈥� niece Teena Acree at a news conference last July to announce a civil lawsuit against Las Vegas and four city police officers on behalf of the family of Byron Williams, a Black man who died in police custody.

Raveendran said working with the Floyd family was the honor of her life. 鈥淭here truly is not a more kind or inspirational family,鈥� she said. 鈥淭hey relive their trauma over and over to support other families.鈥�

She worked long hours on the case, often falling asleep with a document and highlighter marker in hand.

What made the case challenging was a legal doctrine called 鈥渜ualified immunity鈥� that can shield police from civil suits for their actions unless plaintiffs鈥� lawyers successfully demonstrate a violation of a person鈥檚 rights and that those rights are clearly established under the law. In the wake of Floyd鈥檚 killing, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2021 to institute reforms and limit the use of qualified immunity, but it stalled in the U.S. Senate.

Less than six weeks after the Floyd family settled the civil lawsuit, a Minneapolis jury convicted Chauvin on murder charges, and, in February of this year, the other three former officers on the scene were convicted on federal civil rights violations in Floyd鈥檚 death.

The horror of the incident inspired police reform and personnel changes in Minneapolis and other municipalities and, not least, the larger reckoning around racism that continues to roil American society and culture.

鈥淚 think our country has opened its eyes,鈥� Raveendran said. But, to her dismay, police-related wrongful death cases haven鈥檛 disappeared, and her firm continues to partner with Crump to pursue them.

鈥淲e have a new case every day,鈥� Raveendran said. 鈥淚 wish [the police] would just put us out of business in this area.鈥�

— Julia M. Klein